What's Mine Is Yours PDF Free Download

  1. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belotti, V., Ambard, A., Turner, D., Gossmann, C., Demkova, K., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). A muddle of models of motivation for using peer-to-peer economy systems. In Proceedings of CHI 2015 conference, Crossings, South Korea.Google Scholar
  3. Bortree, D. S. (2005). Presentation of self on the web: An ethnographic study of teenage girls’ weblogs. Education, Communication & Information, 5(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, C.-P. (2013). Exploring personal branding on YouTube. Journal of Internet Commerce, 12(4), 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dominick, J. R. (1999). Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-presentation on the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(4), 646–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation process in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software - Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2013). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Working paper. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2271971
  12. Higuchi, K. (2015). KH Coder 2.x reference manual. Retrieved from http://khc.sourceforge.net/en/manual_en_v2.pdf
  13. Inside Airbnb. (2015). Get the data. Retrieved from http://insideairbnb.com/get-the-data.html
  14. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(6), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, J., & Tussyadiah, I. P. (2013). Social networking and social support in tourism experience: The moderating role of online self-presentation strategies. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1–2), 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, J., Yoon, Y., & Zo, H. (2015). Why people participate in the sharing economy: A social exchange perspective. In PACIS 2015 proceedings (Paper 76). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015/76
  18. Labrecque, L. I., Markos, E. C., & Milne, G. R. (2011). Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. doi:10.1002/cb.1512 (OnlineFirst).Google Scholar
  20. Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2005). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0512106v1.pdf
  21. Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Sanderson, J. (2008). The blog is serving its purpose: Self-presentation strategies on 38pitches.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 912–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwabel, D. (2009). Me 2.0: A powerful way to achieve brand success. New York: Kaplan Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Shepherd, I. D. H. (2005). From Cattle and Coke to Charlie: Meeting the challenge of self marketing and personal branding. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toma, C., Hancock, J., & Ellison, N. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003 (pp. 252–259). Retrieved from http://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/tagging.pdf
  27. Trammel, K. D., & Keshelashvili, A. (2005). Examining the new influences: A self-presentation study of A-list blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 968–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tussyadiah, I. P. (2015). An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel. In I. Tussyadiah & A. Inversini (Eds.), Information & communication technologies in tourism 2015 (pp. 819–832). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Tussyadiah, I. P., & Pesonen, J. (2015). Impacts of peer-to-peer accommodation use on travel pattern. Journal of Travel Research. doi:10.1177/0047287515608505.Google Scholar
  30. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interactions: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyper personal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. (2015). A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Working paper. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2554500

WhatIsMyIP.com® is the industry leader in providing IP address information. Knowing your public IP address is crucial for online gaming, using remote desktop connections, and connecting to a security camera DVR. The IP address assigned to your home network allows you to be connected to the internet. WhatIsMyIP.com can also help you identify your VPN location if your goal is to protect your privacy or watch Netflix from a different region.

What' s mine is yours pdf free. download full

What is an Ontology? This definition was originally proposed in 1992 and posted as shown below. See an updated definition of ontology (computer science) that accounts for the literature before and after that posting, with links to further readings. WhatIsMyIP.com® is the industry leader in providing IP address information. Knowing your public IP address is crucial for online gaming, using remote desktop connections, and connecting to a security camera DVR. As with the rest of the series, What's Mine Is Yours features mostly unsigned bands contributing songs that were previously unreleased. 1 3 Track listing edit.

What is love

WhatIsMyIP.com provides tools that allow users to perform an IP Location Lookup, IP Whois Lookup, Internet Speed Test, Proxy Detection, and more. Extensive tutorials show users how to trace an email address, how to create strong passwords, and how to avoid being tracked by ads online.

What Is An IP Address?

IP address stands for Internet Protocol Address. An IP is a unique number assigned to all information technology connected devices such as printers, routers, modems, and even refrigerators. The IP address identifies and allows these devices the ability to communicate with each other on an internal or external computer network. Any device that transmits or receives internet traffic will be assigned an IP address.

There is a standard of communication which is called an Internet Protocol (IP) standard. In laymans terms it is the same as your home address. In order for you to receive snail mail, the sending party must have your correct mailing address (IP address). If any of the mailing information is incorrect, you do not receive bills, pizza coupons or your tax refund.

The same is true for all equipment on the internet. Without this specific address, information cannot be received.

IP addresses may either be assigned static or dynamic. Static IPs are reserved for an Email server/Business server or a permanent home resident. These IPs are assigned from a pool of available addresses from your Internet Service Provider. A static IP may not be available in all areas and may cost extra.

Dynamic IP address are usually assigned on a first come, first served basis. The types of IP addresses that are dynamic are often assigned to residential customers.

Public vs. Private IP likely means someone wants to remain anonymous. The best way to accomplish this is by using a VPN (Virtual Private Network) service or proxy servers.

However, in tech terms private IP addresses are those addresses that are reserved for internal network use only. Your home router has an external IP address and internal IP address. The internal IP address is likely Your router will assign private IPs to all connected devices on your home network.

The current versions of IP addresses being assigned are IPv4 and IPv6.

What Is IPv4?

IP version 4 is currently used by most network devices. However, with more and more computers accessing the internet, IPv4 addresses are running out quickly. Just like in a city, addresses have to be created for new neighborhoods but, if your neighborhood gets too large, you will have to come up with an entire new pool of addresses.

There are exactly 4,294,967,296 IPv4 addresses that can be assigned. IPv4 addresses consist of four octets using 0-255 and are separated by decimals like this

What Is IPv6?

Internet Protocol version 6 is the replacement for the aging IPv4. An IPv6 address consists of 8 groups of four hexadecimal digits (0-9 and a-f) separated by colons and looks like this 2600:1005:b062:61e4:74d7:f292:802c:fbfd. If one of the groups only contains zeros, that group can be omitted.


One example is 2600:1005:b062:0000:74d7:f292:802c:fbfd can be rewritten as 2600:1005:b062::74d7:f292:802c:fbfd. The estimated number of unique addresses for IPv6 is 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 or 2^128.

The old and current standard of addresses was this: and the new way can be written different ways but means the same and are all valid:

* 1080:0000:0000:0000:0000:0034:0000:417A

* 1080:0:0:0:0:34:0:417A

* 1080::34:0:417A

Static IP vs. Dynamic IP

The short definition is a static IP doesn't change where a dynamic IP can change. A dynamic IP will not always change though as it depends on how the ISP has the IP address lease times and assignments setup.


Our API gives you access to most of our tools through a specific URL interface.

Check our pricing page to see different account level usage allowances.

Gold level accounts get 10 API keys.

What's Mine Is Yours Book Pdf

Each key is allowed 1,440 calls per day (1 per minute) for a total of 14,400 calls per 24 hour period. API Definition